Mold: Venkatesh, Trisha, Kota Srinivas Rao, K.Viswanath, Swathi colors, Sri Ram and many others.

Flag: Productions of Sri Saideva

Music: Yuvan Shankar Raja

Dialogues: Ramesh Gopi

Producing Sanam Naga Ashok Kumar and N.V Prasad

History, script and direction: Selva Raghavan

History:

Ganesh (Venkatesh), unmarried unemployed by last the 10 years, has two friends, very good Sunil and Vasu (sri Ram). It suddenly assembles a company of software for Keerthi (Trisha) with whom he he falls in love as of day one. He proposes it and comes knowledge that already engaged to bava and its going to marry in a month. That bava is not none other than Vasu (Sri Ram). What happens to the life of Ganesh is
the importanr after that.

Performence:

Venkatesh is again in its best one of this actor of the family. Their opportune comedy and expressions are excellent. The way that it handled emotional sequences was good true. Venkatesh satisfies more better possible for this class of paper. Trisha in the last, has made a little act. It proved itself like talented actress with this film. It was charming also in this film. The Sri Ram and Sunil have made a good work like friends of the hero. Its pleasant and restoration to see the Sri ram after a long opening. Colors Swathis good in their character bubbly and naughty character.
Kota Srinivas Rao has made a recommendable work like father of the hero. It demonstrated his temp experience in this paper. He lived simply in the character of a father of the middle-class.

K.Viswanath was good as they head-man of a common family.

The music of Yuvan Shankar Raja is not worthy of a mention.

The history of Selva Raghavan is good but he is routine and it was often experimented previous. It took the routine formula from the success of the hero who gained the love of a girl who hails of a great and final family. Due to this routine formula, history appears to be copied. The script and the direction of the Selva Raghavan are good but it remembers the same films to us of generates that they were once block busters. But a good Raghavan thing could puts in evidence was comedy. Few scenes in the film are uproars of the laughter. The comedy was opportune with correct expressions of all the artists.

Forces: Venkatesh …… Venkatesh …… Venkatesh and comedy until certain point.
Weakness: Old history, bad music, bad game and of friction of the screen, undesired scenes and situations in the climax.

Commentaries:

1. Venkatesh remembers its old films to us as the idera of “Crack”, “Kalisundam Raa” and “Premante” with his to act emotional.

2. The idera his as if the Raghavan Forest saw films like “DDLJ”, of “Santhosham”, “Kalisundam Raa”, “Premante” and wrote this history.

3. The comedy is good in most of the sequences but it became a small overdose in few other sequences.

4. Didnt of Raghavan of the Forest knows to finish history and so it spoiled the climax.

5. The music of Yuvan Shankar Raja is not good, to hear and to consider.

6. Kota Srinivas Rao made the same action and paper class that he did in “Bommarillu”.

7. The film is amied in the hearings but it of the family idles of didnt the agreed one straight to touch his hearts. Line of the

label: He himself formula will not ask for all the films.